أخبار العالم

‘Has Rwanda turned “safe” after the Home secretary’s visit there?’ | UK News


Is Rishi Sunak’s Rwanda asylum plan doomed to fail? (Credits: PA)

It’s not looking so good for the Conservatives’ Rwanda asylum plan.

Prime minister Rishi Sunak held an emergency meeting in Downing Street this morning to double down and defend his pledge to ‘stop the boats’, less than a month after the Supreme Court ruled the Central African nation as unsafe.

Despite a freshly inked treaty with Rwanda, the bill hasn’t had the warmest of responses from the public or his party with former immigration minister Robert Jenrick resigning yesterday.

Read on to see what readers think about this issue, among others.

Share your thoughts in the comments.



Is Rishi Sunak getting his just deserts?

To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web
browser that
supports HTML5
video

Prime minister Rishi Sunak is getting his just deserts – from the rather unlikely quarter of Robert Jenrick, who has resigned as immigration minister (Metro, Thu). This is for proposing the Rwanda Bill, which gives ministers the right to override some human rights law. Jenrick said the bill ‘does not go far enough’.

Among other things, the bill will set 
a bad precedent. It could also be the creation of a slippery slope that will lead to other groups being in effect ‘outlawed’.

This has to be an occasion when those concerned with fundamental rights recall Lord Steyn’s observation in 2005 (in Jackson v Attorney General) that there
may, in fact, be a limit to parliamentary sovereignty and that it cannot simply override the courts.

Hopefully, while Tory MPs scrap among themselves, the whole wretched project will be ditched. Andrew McLuskey, Ashford, Middlesex



METRO TALK – HAVE YOUR SAY

Let us know what you think…

Start a text with VIEWS followed by your comment, name and where you live to 65700. Standard network charge applies. Or email mail@ukmetro.co.uk Helpline for Views, Rush-Hour Crush and Good Deed Feed: 020 3615 0600.

Remember, you are more likely to be published if you provide your name and location with your

Full T&Cs here. Metro.co.uk is a member of the Independent Press Standards Organisation. Comments may be edited for reasons of legality, clarity or space.

‘The Tories are happy to dehumanise immigrants and use their labour’

British Home Secretary James Cleverly and Rwandan Minister of Foreign Affairs Vincent Biruta hold a bilateral meeting after signing a new treaty, in Kigali, Rwanda, December 5, 2023. The treaty will address concerns by the Supreme Court, including assurances that Rwanda will not remove anybody transferred under the partnership to another country. Ben Birchall/Pool via REUTERS REFILE - QUALITY REPEAT DUE TO TRANSMISSION ERROR

Home Secretary James Cleverly met with the Rwandan Minister of Foreign Affairs Vincent Biruta on Wednesday (Credits: via REUTERS)

The Rwanda policy is just more nonsense being fed to the public to satiate their hatred for the ‘other’ while addressing none of the issues. The poor sods who will be rerouted to Rwanda on their travels are but a drop in the bucket when it comes to the migration numbers.

The Tories are happy to dehumanise them while in the same breath facilitating the cheap labour that comes in here for their big-business buddies. Josh, North London

Home secretary James Cleverly is hoping that the new Rwanda treaty will lead to plane-loads of illegal migrants being deported to Rwanda (Metro, Wed).

I have news for him: the Supreme Court is unlikely to allow it to happen, having last month deemed Rwanda not a safe third country to send migrants to. What part of ‘not a safe country’ does Cleverly not so cleverly understand? Scott, West London

Britain's former Minister of State for Immigration, Robert Jenrick leaves his home in central London, on December 7, 2023, following his resignation the previous evening. Britain's ruling Conservative party was in disarray Wednesday after its immigration minister quit over legislation regarding sending migrants to Rwanda as hardliners turned the screw on Prime Minister Rishi Sunak. (Photo by HENRY NICHOLLS / AFP) (Photo by HENRY NICHOLLS/AFP via Getty Images)

Robert Jenrick quit over legislation regarding sending migrants to Rwanda saying that it was ‘not tough enough’ (Photo by HENRY NICHOLLS / AFP)

Should the Prime Minister call a general election?

Well, Jenrick, you’ve gone and done it for Corporal Sunak. He was floundering in the already troublesome water and now you’ve put one below his waterline.

But the situation is well beyond Corporal Sunak’s capabilities. Surely he could see that cobbling together a half-baked plan with Private Cleverly was never going to get off the ground, let alone put poor souls at the mercy of the Kigali regime.

Frankly, it’s time to be the grown-up in the room and call a general election. The gravy-trainers in the Commons need to get out at the next station and seek a proper mandate to start again. They are fed up and the country is fed up. Even the so-called illegals have had enough.

Corporal Sunak, tell your wife to get things ready for an extended vacation in America. Anyone disagree? Tony B, Thailand

What do you think? (Metro.co.uk)

What do you think? (Metro.co.uk)

The minority middle-class woke brigade have little to lose if the Rwanda policy gets dragged back through the courts, unlike the majority of taxpayers who don’t have access to a private pension or private health.

Using the courts is a stealth infringement on my voting rights. The sooner this is understood by the general public, the better. I wonder if and when Labour are the government they too will have decisions of the court block their ambitions. Time will only tell. Paul, West Midlands

‘That treaty might not be worth the paper it’s written on’

The government is hoping that former home secretary Suella Braverman’s ‘dream’ to see a flight take asylum seekers to Rwanda will soon come true. However, has Rwanda now turned ‘safe’ following Cleverly’s visit there to draw up a treaty?

I don’t think so for one minute. Treaties are not necessarily legally watertight. Our trade treaty with the EU after Brexit was almost completely torn up by Boris Johnson in a fit of pique.

The same could easily happen with any treaty between the UK and Rwanda. The treaty might not even be worth the paper it’s written on. Al, Charlton

In defence of Slade’s Christmas classic – plus Harry’s false sense on his security

Slade On Top Of The Pops

Is everybody having fun? (Picture: Michael Putland/Getty Images)

Greg (MetroTalk, Thu) says he hates Slade’s Christmas classic Merry Xmas Everybody. I couldn’t disagree more – it’s got a wicked, almost anti-Christmas, vibe. With Noddy Holder, you certainly feel the noise! Jim, London

Sacrilege, Greg, to slate the great Slade. Noddy and the boys won’t be happy. Slade, along with Wizzard, Greg Lake and one or two others, are listed treasures. The untouchables, if you like. I’ve never understood the popularity of Mariah Carey’s All I Want For Christmas Is You. It’s cheesier than a large bag of Wotsits. Dec, Essex

Greg says Merry Xmas Everybody is an abomination. Disgraceful! Hearing Noddy yelling out ‘It’s Christtttmaaass’ at the end is as important a yuletide tradition as crackers, turkeys and great aunt Edith falling asleep during EastEnders. Heather, Blackpool

Alice (MetroTalk, Thu) used to think a line in Rudolph, The Red-Nosed Reindeer was ‘Olive the other reindeer’ rather than ‘All of’. I often think Abba are singing ‘Feel the beat from the tangerine’ rather than ‘tambourine’ in Dancing Queen. Joe, Brighton

(FILES) Britain's Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex leaves from the Royal Courts of Justice, Britain's High Court, in central London on March 27, 2023. Lawyers for Prince Harry on December 5 began a legal challenge over his security arrangements in the UK, after he quit frontline royal duties and moved to North America. The case about his loss of UK taxpayer-funded protection is the latest in a string of court proceedings initiated by Harry, whose father is King Charles III. (Photo by JUSTIN TALLIS / AFP) (Photo by JUSTIN TALLIS/AFP via Getty Images)

Does Prince Harry need more protection in the UK or is he the same as any other celebrity? (Picture: Justin Tallis / AFP)

So Harry the entitled one thinks his level of protection in the UK is ‘unfair’ (Metro, Wed). I happen to think his life of luxury and privilege is also unfair. Life’s unfair, pal – it’s about time you paid for your own protection. Darren, Edinburgh

When a Hollywood star arrives in the UK, does the state pay for their security? If they pay for it themselves, surely Harry (formally known as Prince) should pay for it himself. Glen, Rainhill


MORE : Rishi Sunak holds emergency press conference over Rwanda policy crisis


MORE : Prince Harry says UK can’t be home for his children ‘if they can’t be kept safe’


MORE : Home Secretary signs fresh treaty with Rwanda in bid to revive asylum plan



مقالات ذات صلة

اترك تعليقاً

لن يتم نشر عنوان بريدك الإلكتروني. الحقول الإلزامية مشار إليها بـ *

زر الذهاب إلى الأعلى